Guantanamo Degradation Revealed
by Rupert Cornwell

Friday, July 15, 2005 by the Independent (UK)

A Pentagon investigation has provided the clearest proof yet that the
prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib which shocked the world was in largely
"road-tested" at the US detention centre at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The
investigation report, delivered to the Senate Armed Services Committee,
found that techniques used at Guantanamo which had drawn complaints
from FBI agents at the centre, did not constitute torture. And
Major-General Geoffrey Miller, the commander of the prison in 2002 and
2003, who later went to Iraq to oversee detainee operations, escaped
reprimand because his superiors ruled that prisoner interrogations
during his tenure at Guantanamo did not breach US laws and regulations.

But the similarities between the treatment of at least one prisoner at
Guantanamo Bay and what happened more than a year later in Iraq, proved
"these techniques were not invented in the backwoods of West Virginia",
said one human rights official here, referring to the low-ranking
reservists who have borne the brunt of the punishment for Abu Ghraib.

The report said Mohamed al-Qahtani, a detainee accused of being the
missing "20th hijacker" of 9/11, gave no information under standard
interrogation, so his questioners forced him to stand naked in front
of women, made him wear a bra and told him he was homosexual and that
other prisoners knew it. They threatened him with dogs put a leash
on him and forced him to act like a dog. Such techniques, and even
more degrading variants, were used at Abu Ghraib prison.

The Pentagon officials said the methods, temporarily approved by
the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, but later banned, were
"creative" and "aggressive" but did not amount to torture. Some
Republican senators questioned the need for the investigation, the
latest of half a dozen into alleged abuse of detainees. James Inhofe,
an Oklahoma Republican, said: "We've nothing to be ashamed of."