Click here to support CAE
   
 
16beavergroup.org ARTicles 16beavergroup.org About Mondays ARTicles Journalisms Events


Avi -- Proposed bill will enable Palestinian detainees to be held incommunicado -- 11.04.05

Printer-friendly verion

http://www.btselem.org/English/Special/20051030_Detention_Law.asp

30 Oct. 05: Proposed bill will enable Palestinian detainees to be held incommunicado

The Cabinet's Ministerial Committee for Legislation recently approved a bill initiated by the Ministry of Justice that will allow non-residents of Israel who are suspected of having committed security offenses to he held almost completely incommunicado for fifty days. The bill, which is proposed as a temporary order that will remain in effect for one year, is expected to be brought before the Knesset plenum for a first reading in the coming days. If enacted, the law will severely breach the fundamental rights of suspects in criminal proceedings, and increase the risk of maltreatment during interrogations.

Time to act!

Write to MK Michael Eitan, Chair of the Knesset Law Committee and request that he remove the proposed law from the Knesset's agenda. MK Eitan may be reached by fax at +972-2-6496404, or by e-mail at meitan@knesset.gov.il.

Background

The government initiative regarding prolonged incommunicado detention comes following the revocation of the military legislation that was in effect in the Gaza Strip prior to disengagement. The military legislation had given the security forces broad powers regarding the detention of Gaza residents.

The bill empowers the General Security Service to delay bringing persons suspected of committing security offenses before a judge for a period of ninety-six hours. The Detention Law requires that a suspect be brought before a judge within twenty-four hours, and within forty-eight hours in special cases when urgent interrogation is required. In addition, the bill enables the state to prevent a suspect from meeting with an attorney for a cumulative period of fifty days ( an initial twenty-one days, which can then be extended for periods of seven days ), upon approval of a Supreme Court justice. Under the Detention Law, such a meeting can be prevented, with court approval, for no more than twenty-one days.

Of even more concern than these elements of the legislation is the fact that following the initial approval of detention, the courts may extend the detention, and hear the appeal on the decision to extend the detention, in the absence of the suspect. The presence of a detainee at a court proceeding to extend the detention is a fundamental pillar of the criminal justice process. Under the current law, the state is required to allow the detainee to be present in all cases. The effect of the bill, as stated, is that a suspect may be held incommunicado for a total of fifty days.

The right of a detainee to maintain ongoing contact with the external world is one of the guarantees that the detention will not be used as means of pressuring detainees, by making them think that they are completely subject to the benevolence of their interrogators, who are not subject to supervision of any kind. The right also serves as a principal guarantee that the suspect will not be tortured during interrogation. It is for these reasons that the right of suspects to meet with their attorney, to be brought before a judge without delay, and to be present at hearings to extend their detention are so important.

If enacted, this law will illegally discriminate against detainees based on their residency, with Israeli residents being treated one way and foreign residents, particularly residents of Gaza , in a different way. Such discrimination flagrantly breaches the International Covenant on Civi






Email this article to a friend:
Friend's email (required):
*Separate multiple emails with commas.



Your email address (required):



Message (optional):



 
Post or contact
Subscribe

Search
Archives
April 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003


Recent
Slavoj Zizek: “Neoliberalism is in Crisis”

Rene -- A revolution against neoliberalism?

Independent -- The US bank and the secret plan to destroy WikiLeaks

Counterpunch -- The Libyan Labyrinth

Rene -- In search of an African revolution

Democracy Now -- Chomsky -- “Democracy Uprising” in the U.S.A.?

Counterpunch -- How Democracy Could be Hijacked

LRB -- After Egypt

Dan -- Nettime -- Wisconsin report

Nettime -- Decentralizing the Internet So Big Brother Can’t Find You