Click here to support CAE
   
 
16beavergroup.org ARTicles 16beavergroup.org About Mondays ARTicles Journalisms Events


ARTIST RELEASED FROM PRETRIAL SUPERVISION OVER DOJ OBJECTIONS -- 11.18.05

Printer-friendly verion

ARTIST RELEASED FROM PRETRIAL SUPERVISION OVER DOJ OBJECTIONS
Supervisor requests release, prosecution attempts to block

Contacts:
Edmund Cardoni 1-716-812-9237
Gregg Bordowitz 1-312-420-6092
Lucia Sommer 1-716-359-3061
mailto:media@caedefensefund.org

Buffalo, NY - Artist and University at Buffalo professor Steven Kurtz
has been released from pretrial supervision despite strong objections
from US Department of Justice prosecutor William Hochul.

Kurtz's case has not yet gone to trial and motions for its dismissal
are pending, but until last week the artist was subject to random
house searches and drug tests, was limited in his ability to travel,
and had to report regularly to a probation officer. (See "Summary of
Case" below for background.)

Last week, arguing that there was no hint of criminality or risk of
flight, Zenaida Piotrowicz, Kurtz's pretrial supervisor, motioned a
federal court to release Kurtz from supervision. Despite vigorous and
exceptional objections by Department of Justice prosecutor Hochul,
Magistrate Judge Kenneth Schroeder agreed there was no reason not to
release Kurtz on his own recognizance to await trial.

Kurtz's Defense Committee believes that the prosecutor's unusual and
fierce opposition to the pretrial supervisor's motion to release
Kurtz from probation is yet another example of the extreme prejudice
with which the Department of Justice has approached the case. The
Defense Committee believes the case in fact represents a deliberate
attempt to intimidate and silence artists and scholars critical of US
government policy, and that the DOJ's extreme prejudice is further
suggested by the following facts:

* This is the first time the Department of Justice has ever tried to
prosecute the alleged breaking of a material transfer agreement as
federal mail fraud. In the prosecution's radical interpretation of
mail fraud law, incorrectly filling in a warranty card would be
grounds for federal criminal prosecution. Last July, at a hearing on
the case, Magistrate Judge Kenneth Schroeder noted that such an
interpretation would be akin to opening a "Pandora's box."

* The Department of Justice is completely outside its own guidelines
for prosecution on this case ("9-43.100 Prosecution Policy Relating
to Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud"). According to these guidelines, an
alleged infraction involving $256 worth of harmless bacteria should
be left to the relevant state agencies, i.e. those of New York and
Pennsylvania; these, however, have declined to take action in the
case. (The alleged victims of the "fraud," American Type Culture
Collection and the University of Pittsburgh, have likewise declined
to take any action, either criminal or civil.)

* The substances Kurtz allegedly received are harmless and are not
regulated by any law or government agency (EPA, FDA, etc.), as
prosecutor Hochul was forced to admit at a hearing last July.
Furthermore, they are legal for any citizen to buy and possess. Their
intended use was very obviously in bonafide creative work and
research by a well-known artist and university professor with a long
and institutionally validated record.

Kurtz is currently awaiting a ruling on motions to dismiss the entire
case filed by his attorney Paul Cambria.

SUMMARY OF CASE

Almost eighteen months have passed since Kurtz awoke to find that his
wife of twenty years had died of heart failure. He called the police,
who, upon noticing lab equipment that Kurtz used in his artwork and
teaching, contacted the FBI. The FBI detained Kurtz as a potential
"bioterrorist" and initiated an investigation involving the Joint
Terrorism Task Force, the Department of Homeland Security, and
numerous other federal and international law enforcement agencies, at
an estimated cost to taxpayers in the millions of dollars.

Kurtz was finally indicted not for bioterrorism, but for "mail and
wire fraud" - charges traditionally brought in weak cases when no
other charges will stick. (These charges still carry a possible
sentence of twenty years in prison.)

###

For more information, please contact Edmund Cardoni (716-812-9237),
Gregg Bordowitz (312-420-6092) or Lucia Sommer (716-359-3061), or
send email to mailto:media@caedefensefund.org.

The CAE Defense Fund website is http://www.caedefensefund.org







Email this article to a friend:
Friend's email (required):
*Separate multiple emails with commas.



Your email address (required):



Message (optional):



 
Post or contact
Subscribe

Search
Archives
April 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003


Recent
Slavoj Zizek: “Neoliberalism is in Crisis”

Rene -- A revolution against neoliberalism?

Independent -- The US bank and the secret plan to destroy WikiLeaks

Counterpunch -- The Libyan Labyrinth

Rene -- In search of an African revolution

Democracy Now -- Chomsky -- “Democracy Uprising” in the U.S.A.?

Counterpunch -- How Democracy Could be Hijacked

LRB -- After Egypt

Dan -- Nettime -- Wisconsin report

Nettime -- Decentralizing the Internet So Big Brother Can’t Find You