Click here to support CAE
   
 
16beavergroup.org ARTicles 16beavergroup.org About Mondays ARTicles Journalisms Events


Anjalisa -- Open Letter: Shaheed Bhagat Singh's nephew appeals against Death Penalty -- 10.02.06

Printer-friendly verion

Compliments of Multitudes:

Open Letter: Shaheed Bhagat Singh's nephew appeals against Death Penalty

To President Abdul Kalam and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh


Dear sirs

We are writing to appeal to you to commute the death sentence of
Mohammed Afzal, the only accused in the Parliament Attack case to have
been sentenced to die. We write just in case what we have to say has
not already occurred to you, or in case you are inclined not to act on
your own natural instincts because you have been persuaded by some
more cold hearted logic.


We wish to argue that our country can honour Mahatma Gandhi and
Shaheed Bhagat Singh by doing away with the death penalty altogether
as there are many valid grounds for this:

1. A civil society should not descend to the status of murderers by
preferring revenge over far better forms of justice.

2. All investigations, however meticulous, are subject to human error.
Such errors become irreversible in case the death penalty is imposed.
All over the world there have been cases of executed people being
proved innocent after their death.

3. In countries like ours where there is a huge gap between the
privileged and the dispossessed, the death penalty becomes the final
method of implementing class injustice. A cursory glance at the list
of all those executed in our country will reveal the blatant fact that
almost all of them were poor. The rich are rarely found guilty and
even if they are, they are rarely executed.

4. There is no international evidence to suggest that the death
penalty is a deterrent to violent and heinous crime. Countries like UK
that did away with the death penalty did not see a rise in such crimes
while countries like the USA that continue to impose the penalty, show
no decline.

Moving from the general to the particular, our main argument is not
that Mohammed Afzal is likely to be innocent, and we are not appealing
for a pardon but for the commutation of the death penalty imposed upon
him. Such a bold decision may or may not change the heart of Mr.
Afzal, but it is likely to send a positive signal to the world.

If Momammed Afzal is a terrorist today, he was surely not born one.
And he need not die one. Circumstances made him what he is. And
circumstances may change him. The death penalty will change no one.
Far from being a deterrent, martyrdom, as some will surely perceive
it, can only achieve the opposite effect. To recall a relevant
example, in comparison to today, the Kashmir valley was virtually
peaceful prior to the judicial execution of Maqbool Butt in 1984.

The meaningful dialogue for peace that you have initiated on all
issues should not be abruptly derailed by a mechanical approach to law
and order. We appeal to you to halt the cycle of revenge that has been
unleashed in our country and elsewhere in the world by making a bold
statement that India wishes to reassert the path of humanity, not
perpetuate the path of violence.

One of the signatories to this letter is a historian and a nephew of
Shaheed Bhagat Singh.

Signed: Professor Jagmohan Singh (09814001836), Anand Patwardhan
(09819882244)

Bombay , 29 September, 2006







Email this article to a friend:
Friend's email (required):
*Separate multiple emails with commas.



Your email address (required):



Message (optional):



 
Post or contact
Subscribe

Search
Archives
April 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003


Recent
Slavoj Zizek: “Neoliberalism is in Crisis”

Rene -- A revolution against neoliberalism?

Independent -- The US bank and the secret plan to destroy WikiLeaks

Counterpunch -- The Libyan Labyrinth

Rene -- In search of an African revolution

Democracy Now -- Chomsky -- “Democracy Uprising” in the U.S.A.?

Counterpunch -- How Democracy Could be Hijacked

LRB -- After Egypt

Dan -- Nettime -- Wisconsin report

Nettime -- Decentralizing the Internet So Big Brother Can’t Find You