I do not know why i fall for these articles sometimes (i say this because the entire pre-electoral noise / hype machine can be engrossing for all of the wrong reasons). But an article about a small radio ad that goes far in analyzing one of the main republican candidates and new york's former mayor. -rg

THIS IS ONE DANGEROUS MAN: IT'S GEORGE BUSH WITH BRAINS
Michael Tomasky in Washington, michael.tomasky@guardian.co.uk

The Guardian
Monday November 5, 2007

New York's former mayor Rudy Giuliani is living up to his reputation
as someone who will do and say anything for power

People of Britain: congratulations are in order. You have now joined
ferret owners, sidewalk artists, hot dog vendors, publicly funded
attorneys for poor people, low-income community college students,
museum curators, a couple of innocent black men shot dead by the
police, the sections of the New York City charter governing rules
of succession to the mayoralty and, of course, Hillary Clinton,
as objects of Rudy Giuliani's demagoguery and wrath.

You may by now have heard the story. In a radio ad that his campaign
prepared for New Hampshire voters, Giuliani tells listeners that
he was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2000 and goes on to say:
"My chance of surviving cancer - and thank God I was cured of it -
in the United States: 82%. My chances of surviving prostate cancer
in England: only 44% under socialised medicine."

The numbers are false. The actual five-year survival rate in Britain
is 74%, which is still lower than America's, but obviously high
enough for the figure not to have constituted fodder for a campaign
commercial. (Even the remaining, much smaller difference, is largely
explained by more widespread screening in the US, which catches many
more incidents of prostate cancer that are non-lethal).

It turned out that Giuliani's numbers were from a seven-year-old
article in a conservative policy journal. The article was written by
his own healthcare policy adviser, who admitted that his comparison
was a "crude" interpretation of a study by a respected health policy
group. The group, in turn, said the article's author had grossly
misused its numbers.

That's about as red-handed as anyone in politics gets caught these
days. But when asked if the campaign would continue to use the figure,
a Giuliani spokeswoman said, "Yes, we will."

I know the form all too well. I covered Giuliani for a dozen years
in New York (note to angry American rightwingers preparing to email
me a warning to keep my foreign nose out of their business: I'm as
American as a Ford F-150).

The man lies with staggering impunity. But here's the thing: he does
it with such conviction and such seeming authority that people who
are not inclined to study the matter will believe him - will in fact
be utterly convinced that Giuliani is speaking the gospel truth,
and they will prove almost impossible to shake from this conviction.

Giuliani's hypocrisy with regard to this ad doesn't end with the fake
statistics. As Joe Conason noted on www.Salon.com, Giuliani was at
the time of his treatment the mayor of New York and enrolled in a
nonprofit health maintenance organisation for government employees -
that is, mini-socialised medicine. And as Ezra Klein noted on Comment
is free, the treatment that saved Giuliani was developed in Denmark -
which, as Klein drolly notes, "is both in Europe and has a universal
healthcare system".

But none of this will stop Giuliani. He will say and do anything he
feels he needs to say and do to get power.

Newspapers write that he was "liberal" on social issues in his mayoral
days, as if his positions on abortion and immigration were matters
of conviction.

Nonsense. He took the positions he needed to take to be elected in
an overwhelmingly Democratic city. (Although to grant him a speck of
humanity, I'd guess that his pro-gay rights views were more or less
genuine: anyone living in the city gets to know many gay people.)

And now he is saying and doing whatever he needs to say and do to get
millions of rightwing Americans to support him. He recently told a
meeting of social conservatives that his reliance on God "is at the
core of who I am". As mayor he was known to attend mass almost never,
he obviously cheated serially on the wife (wife No 2) he married in
the Catholic church, and the only occasions on which I can remember
him invoking God when he was mayor were the two times he was forced
to say "so help me God" in taking the oath of office.

But forward he will charge, telling more lies with even more
impunity. And immunity, because in a culture where a sense of history
is largely limited to remembering certain stirring television images,
he will for the most part get away with it, confident in the knowledge
that the main thing most Americans will ever recall about him is the
film clip of him running from the rubble of the World Trade Centre on
September 11. A far smaller percentage will know that the reason he had
run was because he had catastrophically decided to place his emergency
command centre in the tower complex - the only building in New York
that had previously been the target of a major terrorist attack.

And by the way: shame on Gordon Brown for inviting him to No 10
in September.

Yes, there's a long tradition of presidents and prime ministers
welcoming party standard-bearers from across the pond. But Giuliani
isn't yet that. Brown had no business giving him the kind of special
benefit that an audience with a prime minister bestows.

Brown and all of Britain will be better off the sooner they figure
this out: Giuliani is a dangerous man. George Bush with brains. Dick
Cheney with better aim. Consider yourself warned.